A reasonable point. A number of them are weak-tights.
However, I think that on average, 2+2ers are better than non 2+2ers, if only because they have shown a wilingness to make an effort.
Then again, given that they tend to play more tables, perhaps this mitigates against them playing as well as they are capable on any one particular table.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: 2+2'ers
Date: 2007-03-13 07:31 pm (UTC)However, I think that on average, 2+2ers are better than non 2+2ers, if only because they have shown a wilingness to make an effort.
Then again, given that they tend to play more tables, perhaps this mitigates against them playing as well as they are capable on any one particular table.
PJ