peterbirks: (Default)
[personal profile] peterbirks
The markets are behaving strangely at the moment, and I suspect that the basic reason is that, although most people agree about what is going to happen (with a significant minority of dissenters), there is no consensus about when it is going to happen or what is the best thing to do about it.

So, the majority now seems to be in the Birks camp of "inflation is coming". This is despite masses of deflationary data being released in the past couple of months. Thus we have the perverse effect fof deflationary/depressionary data being released in the US, but the markets rise and gold goes up in price, because, the sagemeisters conclude, this will force the US to pump even more money into the economy, which will in the long run be inflationary.

However, there are two opposing camps to this.

The first says "sure, inflation is coming, but the markets are tanking now. On top of that, quantitative easing will keep up the demand for bonds. The Fed is not going to buy equities with all that fiat shit it is printing!" And so the price of bonds/gilts remains high and downward pressure still exists on equities.

The second group retain the "we are still heading for Japan in the 1990s" line. They are basically of the opinion that nothing that the Fed can do that is not political suicide will be sufficient to stop a deflationary spiral. The money that will be dropped from helicopters will be shoved under banks' mattresses, or my mattress. The time has come to repay the debts built up in the past 15 or so years. The result will not be pretty and could even include a large dose of political instability. This is the "prepare for worse than the 1930s, this is not even part of the macro-cycle, let alonge some piddling micro-cycle".

If the second group (the significant minority to which I refer above) is right then gold will be a blinding investment (rather than just a good investment along with equities). US treasuries will be a good investment in preference to Inflation-linked bonds or equities, and, to be frank, you might as well be stocking up the larder and your nuclear defence shelter with cans of pulses, because the entire economy might break down.

Of these three groups, the Birks camp of "it will be inflation, and it will be sooner rather than later" seems to be getting the upper hand -- equities are proving surprisingly resilient at a bottom which many observers (including me) thought that they would have seen breached by now. I still see mid-to-late April as the worst of the matter when it comes to company reporting. But if the psychology of the market has shifted to "this will mean even more money being pumped into the economy by governments" then the concomitant collapse in equity prices that one would expect from huge cuts in dividends, will not be forthcoming.

In the past week (in my field), the only large company that has maintained its dividend is Munich Re, and that's with a dividend cover of significantly less than two (the proportion of your earnings that you pay out to shareholders). Swiss Re slashed its dividend to a nominal amount and announced that it would still have to raise about 5bn Swiss Francs. Other insurers announced steep cuts -- and this is an industry that is performing well in the crisis!

My hunch is still on a final tanking of shares in the first half of the year -- another 15% to 20%. So I'm maintaining a short position, but I'm not betting the house on it (although betting the house would be a significantly smaller bet now than it would have been this time last year....)


And with the UK actually going to be hit by a Winter Storm tomorrow night .... well, that might be fun. Not. That's definitely one import from France and Germany that we don't need.

____________

Still?

Date: 2009-02-09 08:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] geoffchall.livejournal.com
Not on point, but I've just come off watching the DVD of the documentary on Joy Division (i.e. not Control). A better film than Control, mainly through the full and very specifc involvement of the band. Some of this is through the biggest collection of extras I think I've ever seen, mainly not-included bits of interviews with the band. Interviewing Hooky about auditioning for a singer and discussing sitting with "some fookin' long-'aired 'ippy from Didsbury", left me wondering whether this was someone I knew, since that described most of my friends in 1975.

One thing the band were very explicit on was that they thought Unknown Pleasures was good but flawed, Closer was pretty good and the rest was just sweepings off the floor.

Re: Still?

Date: 2009-02-09 09:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peterbirks.livejournal.com
Watched Control last night. Beautifuly shot, but not as good as I had anticipated, perhaps because it is so clearly seen from Deborah Curtis' point of view. Will seek out the documentary.

As for the sweepings off the floor line. Well, I still find some of the stuff magnificent in its own sweepings kind of way.

PJ

Re: Still?

Date: 2009-02-09 10:16 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
The documntary does have a reasonable collection of 'rare' footage that I assume has been previously swept into one thing or another, but would be of interest to completists. It's very much a film about the band, Ian Curtis as a subject area is less than one quarter of the film. Control is Curtis's life seen through Debbie's eyes and is more tragic for that. The music on Control is wonderful though and Sam Riley's performance is cracking.

Re: Still?

Date: 2009-02-09 10:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] geoffchall.livejournal.com
Oops. Damned LJ. Interestingly, I checked to remember who it was played Ian Curtis, cos I'm getting hazy about that sort of thing. And it would seem that Sam Riley just got enaged to the actor who played Annike in Control.

Date: 2009-02-09 06:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] verduci.livejournal.com
This is a very strange issue. It's hard to ignore the rapid expansion of the monetary base, but it's also hard to ignore the fact that the monetary base rapidly expanded during The Great Depression.

I just can't buy the inflationist argument because 40 percent of the world's "wealth" has been erased over the past few quarters. I'm thinking a prolonged Japan-style slump is in the future, but as long as governments refrain from artificially jacking up prices of food and other necessities I think we'll avoid most of the political instability and World War messes.

Date: 2009-02-09 09:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] real-aardvark.livejournal.com
I'm beginning to think that one of two things is happening:

(1) The Market has collectively lost its mind
(2) Short-sellers have been badly burned and have gone into hibernation

Movement in equities appears to have lost all contact with day-to-day reality. I don't see yield; I don't see much in the way of fundamentals (EBITDA, cash flow, and reduction in gearing -- God knows how you'd manage that in the current climate); and I don't see confidence in any quarter apart from, possibly, Gulf-backed vultures picking at the rotten carcass of the commercial property market.

Banks suck out £200 million in bonuses -- £100 million of which is "legally obligated," although I'd dispute that in the current circumstances -- from what we can all agree are their badly depleted reserves, and nothing happens

Barclay's hasn't gone bust yet.

The euro is, bizarrely, balanced or even gaining against sterling. This, despite the BoE chopping another pointless quarter of a per cent off the base rate. My Lord, but Germany must be in worse nick than I thought.

Not being inside the loop, I'm just making an assumption that most of the FTSE 500 will be reporting the really awesome bad news in or around April, and that's when the shit will spectacularly hit the fan.

Oh yes,, Joy Division. What a mirthless bunch of Mancunian freaks. (For "mirthless," see Morrissey. For "freaks," see Oasis.) I was always more into the Pretenders, myself.

Date: 2009-02-09 10:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jaybee66.livejournal.com
I have unloaded my silver bullion and gold CFDs and taken a profit.

Statistically, bullion does well during periods of deflation and not so during periods of inflation.

I don't think gold will break $1000 any time soon. At the moment, silver is out-performing gold but not enough to whet my appetite.

I am looking to invest in other commodities for a recovery in prices during the coming year. Actually, I have made a lot more on non-bullion commodities than on bullion this year but won't say any more until I achieve my goals

Date: 2009-02-10 05:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peterbirks.livejournal.com
Asset deflation is not inconsistent with the return of inflation -- indeed, I would argue that they are positively correlated. So, in a way you are right -- 40% of the "wealth" that we were told that we had, we haven't got. The question is, how do we solve this problem -- by punishing the borrowers, or by punishing the savers? Because it is an unfair world, those who have been thrift (the savers) will suffer the most, while the profligate will have their slate wiped relatively clean. This will happen by the nominal value of assets staying the same while their real value is eroded by, yes, inflation.

PJ

August 2023

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13 14151617 1819
20 212223242526
27282930 31  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 24th, 2026 12:27 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios