![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Are you surprised?
Jan. 4th, 2006 07:50 amHeadline from AP Worldstream this morning.
Study shows children no safer in SUVs than cars
JAN DENNIS
AP Worldstream; Jan 03, 2006
Well, to be frank, I don't think that children should be driving either SUVs or cars.
+++++
I tried three-tabling on Ultimate and Party yesterday night and early this morning. Small losses in each left the matter inconclusive. Was it noise, or does my play deteriorate too much when three-tabling? Part of the skill in playing this game is, of course, being able to distinguish noise from underlying trends. And I have a feeling that when I am three-tabling at the moment I am giving up a little bit too much in terms of earn -- perhaps as much as a big bet an hour per table. That's way too high a sacrifice to make.
But I'm not absolutely certain. Perhaps I'll pull back to two-tabling for the next week and then give it another go.
The Party three-tabling was made problematic by the fact that I got a lot of marginal decision hands and a lot of marginal raising/folding hands. Most of the time, things are a lot easier than that, so perhaps the amount of EV sacrificed in the long run would be significantly lower. It's a hard one to evaluate.
Study shows children no safer in SUVs than cars
JAN DENNIS
AP Worldstream; Jan 03, 2006
Well, to be frank, I don't think that children should be driving either SUVs or cars.
+++++
I tried three-tabling on Ultimate and Party yesterday night and early this morning. Small losses in each left the matter inconclusive. Was it noise, or does my play deteriorate too much when three-tabling? Part of the skill in playing this game is, of course, being able to distinguish noise from underlying trends. And I have a feeling that when I am three-tabling at the moment I am giving up a little bit too much in terms of earn -- perhaps as much as a big bet an hour per table. That's way too high a sacrifice to make.
But I'm not absolutely certain. Perhaps I'll pull back to two-tabling for the next week and then give it another go.
The Party three-tabling was made problematic by the fact that I got a lot of marginal decision hands and a lot of marginal raising/folding hands. Most of the time, things are a lot easier than that, so perhaps the amount of EV sacrificed in the long run would be significantly lower. It's a hard one to evaluate.
