New Year

Jan. 2nd, 2009 04:19 pm
peterbirks: (Default)
[personal profile] peterbirks
Well, this time last year I felt refreshed after a break, and was almost looking forward to things. This year it feels different. I have a pile of material on my right hand side, in front of the other computer, making me feel guilty. I have even turned on the office computer in the vain hope that I will feel guilty enough to write some stuff for Monday, but it hasn't happened. In more typical journalistic style, I have said "tomorrow". That just ain't like me at all.

Instead I have been decorating the spare bedroom, and have made significant progress in the past couple of days. Wallpapering the chimney breast was a bitch, and the vertical lines show (if you look carefully) how badly sloping the chimney breast is. This caught me out in a couple of places (the skirting board to the left side of the wall must be two inches below the same skirting board on the right-hand side of the chimney breast). But that's part of the fun of old houses.


I have also been playing cards, and a storming start to the year (+$600 on day one, +$90 so far today) is a cheering prognosis for 2009 as a whole. Then again, I usually do well up until about January 8, at which point the wheels come off. This year I shall be prepared!

The memory cards have arrived for the Roland BR-600 as well, but the piano-playing has taken second place to decorating for the past few days.

I've managed very little reading and very little TV-catch-up on my break, which is perhaps an explanation for me feeling less refreshed than I anticipated. This year will be tough at work and who knows if I will still be in a job come December.

If it weren't seriously anorakish, I'd be tempted to collect the number of times people say that "it isn't fair" or "it's wrong" (by which they mean "morally wrong") in financial programmes.

The first arrived today when there was a pirce on the increase in rail fares. Any commentary on this turns everyone into the financial equivalent of a football supporter. Do you want your club to make money or to win matches?

With the railways, we had a guy getting himself into tortuous economic knots, first of all moaning that trains were too crowded, and, in virtually the next breath, complaining that fares were going up "at a time when in other areas price competition is driving prices down".

This is the problem with rail travel. Is it a social service or a business? The common complaint is that it's a monopoly, but that's bullshit. People can travel by coach or by car instead. They do not do so because the train is, despite their moaning, an easier way to travel. Why, therefore, should they not pay for this added convenience? Many of the loudewst moaners havve chosen to live further away from London (sorry to be London-centric, here, but most of the complaints are from London-bound commuters) because they were bringning up a family and they could only get accommodation sufficiently cheaply by moving further away from the capital. You can hardly therefore moan if the quid pro quo is a higher travel cost.


___________

Jan 2nd

Date: 2009-01-02 07:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] geoffchall.livejournal.com
I have the blessings of January to look forward to. From a work point of view it's utter lunacy and I'll be working circa 10-14 hrs a day until 1st Feb. It gives such a sense of direction that I don't have time to feel any sense of ennui which is the prevalent mood in January. By the time I look up in February, the days will be longer and there are further things to get into.

What is leaving me a little bereft is having spent the early morning of Jan 1st watching the final episdode of The Wire series 5. Not as good, but I guess there was a choice between getting loose ends tied up and being a good narrative. Without injecting spoilers, the nicest aspects were for Bubbles and Michael. Saddest I guess is Duquan and seeing how things turn out positively for Templeton, the newspaper guy.

The star character from series 3 onwards has to be Snoop. Took me many episodes before I realised she was a girl, but the attitude, the accent and the swagger were just so real, it was no surprise to find that she was of-the-streets to begin with.

But now what do I do when my brain needs to be in neutral? Movies just don't seem as worthwhile and books are too hard work for 'relaxation'.

Re: Jan 2nd

Date: 2009-01-02 07:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peterbirks.livejournal.com
I have series five waiting to be watched (a Christmas present from Jan -- asked for!) but I'm just not in the mood to start watchingit at the moment. I didn't realize Snoop was a girl at the beginning either! Just the opening sequence of series 4, where she is buying the nail hammer, is a masterpiece of its own.

Looking forward to watching it, though...


PJ

Re: Jan 2nd

Date: 2009-01-02 07:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peterbirks.livejournal.com
Although I haven't seen series five yet (the newspaper editor, Clark Johnson, is a director of many Wire episodes and was also present for all seven series of Homicide) my favourite character is probably Bubbles, matched on the law side by the gay major. Honarable mentions to Avon Barksdale and Bunk....

PJ

Date: 2009-01-03 10:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jellymillion.livejournal.com
I listened to a rail industry spokesman making two contradictory arguments that were supposed to be supporting the price rise. I managed to stop myself emailing to point this out. This time.

I think the net cost to me is about a tenner a month. Even with the expected zero percent rise and zero bonus I can think of things that will concern me more.

Sometimes the media "debate" is so obviously artificial (let's see if we can find a couple of vaguely associated people to take opposing views in exchange for some airtime) and obviously created to fill a news void plus several hours of fatuous phone-ins.

Date: 2009-01-04 08:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peterbirks.livejournal.com
Yes, obviously there's the "fill the air time" problem, and this has always been a flaw on the Today programme on Radio Four. Too much "debate" that goes nowhere, and too little analysis. Radio Five is better at this and is probably of an intellectually higher quality than the Today programme when it's covering the news. Unfortunately (for R5) it's forced to cut to travel news and sports news for a good third of the broadcasting time. Still, if it gets us away from the self-satisfied John Humphrys, it's worth it.

PJ

Date: 2009-01-04 09:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jellymillion.livejournal.com
Well, maybe. The example I cited came from FiveLive, which I'll agrree is preferable, at least when Nicky Campbell is absent. I suspect it's mostly laziness and cost-benefit: decent analysis is hard work (especially when compared with asking fatuous questions of "experts") and the feeling is probably that it would go straight over the punters' heads. After all, the news should be entertaining.

Where possible I generally prefer to listen to the World Service.

August 2023

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13 14151617 1819
20 212223242526
27282930 31  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 18th, 2026 06:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios