Easy come, easy go
Oct. 23rd, 2007 01:40 pmIf there's one area where you probably have to have currency hedging facilities in place, it's that of ship construction -- a long-term business frequently involving a range of currencies. However, it's also best to ensure that you have good compliance and auditing in place as well.
Step forward SembMarine of Singapore, which got the first bit right, but not the second. About US$248m seems to have been lost by the company's finance director. This is not proprietary trading gone wrong. Sembmarine doesn't allow for any speculative trading. All deals are meant to be hedges against 'real life' agreements. In other words, the only logical explanation for the loss is that the finance director discovered that he liked a punt, and currency trading can be the crack cocaine of punting fun. The markets hardly ever close. BTW, Sembmarine made a profit of $238m last year, so it looks like this gambling foray will wipe out a year's profits. Quality.
I hesitate to imply that it's in the Asian nature to like a gamble, despite the perpetually full betting shops in London's Chinatown. But one might recall that China Aviation Oil also had a senior executive (the CEO) who traded way beyond the company's means, and then he made the mistake of hiding it from investors. That was $500m or so down the pan. All this money presumably ends up somewhere -- although unfortunately not in my pocket. These guys must be the equivalent of the occasional big fish who turns up at a live or online poker game. The trading desks all go into a frenzy trying to get the money first. I look forward to Citigroup (or whichever counterparty it was) boasting in its quartlery results "yeah, we skinned that sucker alive". Unfortunately, I doubt that such a statement would see the light of day:
+++++++++++++++
( A Lucky Hand )
Step forward SembMarine of Singapore, which got the first bit right, but not the second. About US$248m seems to have been lost by the company's finance director. This is not proprietary trading gone wrong. Sembmarine doesn't allow for any speculative trading. All deals are meant to be hedges against 'real life' agreements. In other words, the only logical explanation for the loss is that the finance director discovered that he liked a punt, and currency trading can be the crack cocaine of punting fun. The markets hardly ever close. BTW, Sembmarine made a profit of $238m last year, so it looks like this gambling foray will wipe out a year's profits. Quality.
I hesitate to imply that it's in the Asian nature to like a gamble, despite the perpetually full betting shops in London's Chinatown. But one might recall that China Aviation Oil also had a senior executive (the CEO) who traded way beyond the company's means, and then he made the mistake of hiding it from investors. That was $500m or so down the pan. All this money presumably ends up somewhere -- although unfortunately not in my pocket. These guys must be the equivalent of the occasional big fish who turns up at a live or online poker game. The trading desks all go into a frenzy trying to get the money first. I look forward to Citigroup (or whichever counterparty it was) boasting in its quartlery results "yeah, we skinned that sucker alive". Unfortunately, I doubt that such a statement would see the light of day:
+++++++++++++++
( A Lucky Hand )