peterbirks: (Default)
[personal profile] peterbirks





SITE/STAKES



$5-$10



25c-50c(PLO)



$5



$25



$3-$6



25p-50p



Grand Total



Party Poker



-$155.00



 



 



 



$261.00



 



$106.00



Ultimate Bet



 



-$220.00



 



 



$69.50



 



-$150.50



Betfair



$61.00



 



-$47.95



 



 



$5.00



$18.05



Stan James



 



 



 



-$27.50



 



 



-$27.50



PokerStars



$155.00



 



 



 



$180.50



 



$335.50



Winnings



$61.00



-$220.00



-$47.95



-$27.50



$511.00



$5.00



$281.55



Hours



28.20



23.75



7.50



1.00



31.75



1.00



93.20



Avge Per hour



$2.16



-$9.26



-$6.39



-$27.50



$16.09



$5.00



$3.02




 






Well, I "saved as HTML" this time. Net result is nicer, I admit, but I can't figure out how to reduce the height of the cells! Changing the "height" parameter(yes, even I can work that one out) doesn't seem to make any difference, no matter whether I do it in points, percentages, or just as a simple number. Much of the Office coding is utterly incomprehensible (as well as being pointlessly bloated) and it's hard to see how it links in with the Live Journal restrictions.

At first sight this is not a promising month. $270 in bonuses and oly $280 profit. But I was happy with it. I can take a Zennish attitude to losses (indeed, a series of losses) at this level. I have lost $180 today (although I got $100 of that back in a bonus), but I felt quite calm and in control, which is the important thing.

I was also somewhat cheered by Roswell's figures. Roswell is what I would call a typical very good young American player. He can win absolutely bundles at $15-$30 ... and then will always find some other means by which to lose it back. Then he will beat himself up about it, promise never to try $100-$200 or $10-$20 NL again, or something like that, and go back to the $15-$30 grindstone.

Anyway, that wasn't what cheered me. What it was that gave me a calmer outlook was the revelation that over 30,000 hands or thereabouts, at which he won $20,000, there was a period of 14,000 hands in the middle where he lost $1,000. As Roswell points out, the margins are so thin at upper levels that you can play for a very long time before you can even be sure that you are a winning player.

The point here is that, for 14,000 hands, that could mean seven months or so for me. This makes my chart for this year somewhat easier to bear (a kind of decent rise through to May, then an atmospheric air-sucking leap over a six-week period, followed by stasis for three months) and easier for me to understand. Basically, at 2,000 to 3,000 hands a month, this is quite within expected levels of variance.

By playing $3-$6 I think that I reduce my variance significantly (at least, that is how it seems from the past couple of weeks' play). I'm not sure that I really want that, in the long term, but at the moment it's the right thing for me.

+++++

Picked up Hero from HMV yesterday. And that is what I'm just about to watch (again!).
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

August 2023

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13 14151617 1819
20 212223242526
27282930 31  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 03:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios