![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Whither grammar?
Jul. 22nd, 2005 09:20 amFrom a Superior Court of California ruling on July 19th, referring to a submission from the Department of Insurance.
The report "contains much surplusage and editorializings and fails to plead clearly and specifically any actionable misrepresentation or omission".
"Surplusage"? "Editorializings"?
I actually had to look these up. And, yes, surplusage is there, although I prefer the simpler "surfeit". But "editorializings" misses the cut. How about "opinion"? Or, if you insist, "editorialization"?
The report "contains much surplusage and editorializings and fails to plead clearly and specifically any actionable misrepresentation or omission".
"Surplusage"? "Editorializings"?
I actually had to look these up. And, yes, surplusage is there, although I prefer the simpler "surfeit". But "editorializings" misses the cut. How about "opinion"? Or, if you insist, "editorialization"?
